Statistical indicators for the analysis of social inequalities in Italy

Authors

  • Lucia Mongelli Istat
  • Paola Perchinunno Department of Economics, Management and Business Law, University of Bari Aldo Moro
  • Samuela L'Abbate Department of Humanities Research and Innovation, University of Bari Aldo Moro
  • Antonella Massari Department of Economics, Management and Business Law, University of Bari Aldo Moro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71014/sieds.v80i3.446

Keywords:

territorial inequalities, clustering

Abstract

The analysis of social inequalities is a topic of growing academic and policy interest, recognized as a key dimension in assessing individual and collective well-being. A fundamental prerequisite for any rigorous statistical assessment of inequality is the adoption of a shared, multidimensional definition that captures the complex nature of social disadvantage. This study addresses the need to identify small-area territorial units or population subgroups affected by hardship or severe exclusion. A fuzzy logic approach (Totally Fuzzy and Relative) and a spatial clustering algorithm (DBSCAN) are adopted to construct and interpret indicators of social disadvantage. The analysis draws on 2024 data from the “Equitable and Sustainable Well-being” (BES) framework published by ISTAT, focusing on three domains: socio-demography, employment, and personal safety at the provincial level. This integrated methodology enables the detection of both the intensity and spatial configuration of disadvantage across Italian territories. It provides a robust foundation for evidence-based and place-sensitive policy interventions.

References

BARCA F. 2009. An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_v0306.pdf

CAMPELLO R. J. G. B., MOULAVI D., SANDER J. 2013. Density-based clustering based on hierarchical density estimates. In J. Pei, V. S. Tseng, L. Cao, H. Motoda, G. Xu (Eds.), Advances in knowledge discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol 7819, pp. 160–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37456-2_14

CERIOLI A., ZANI S. 1990. A Fuzzy Approach to the Measurement of Poverty. In Dagum, C., Zenga, M. (Eds.), Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty (pp. 272–283). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84254-1_14

CHELI B., LEMMI A. 1995. A Totally Fuzzy and Relative Approach to the Multidimensional Analysis of Poverty. Economic Notes,Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 115–134.

CHARRON N., LAPUENTE V., ROTHSTEIN B. 2013. Quality of government and corruption from a European perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545591

ESTER M., KRIEGEL H. P., SANDER J., XU X. 1996. A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise. In Proceedings of the second international conference on knowledge discovery and Data Mining (KDD’96), (pp.226–231). AAAI Press.

ISTAT 2024. Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia – Indicatori territoriali. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/benessere-e-sostenibile

OECD 2020. How’s Life? Measuring Well-being. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9870c393-en

STIGLITZ J. E., SEN A., FITOUSSI J. P. 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic performance and social progress. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/118025/118123/Fitoussi+Commission+report

UNDP 2023. Human Development Report: Breaking the Gridlock. UNDP. https://hdr.undp.org

ZADEH L. A. 1965. Fuzzy Sets. Information and control, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

Issue

Section

Articles