Statistical indicators for the analysis of social inequalities in Italy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71014/sieds.v80i3.446Keywords:
territorial inequalities, clusteringAbstract
The analysis of social inequalities is a topic of growing academic and policy interest, recognized as a key dimension in assessing individual and collective well-being. A fundamental prerequisite for any rigorous statistical assessment of inequality is the adoption of a shared, multidimensional definition that captures the complex nature of social disadvantage. This study addresses the need to identify small-area territorial units or population subgroups affected by hardship or severe exclusion. A fuzzy logic approach (Totally Fuzzy and Relative) and a spatial clustering algorithm (DBSCAN) are adopted to construct and interpret indicators of social disadvantage. The analysis draws on 2024 data from the “Equitable and Sustainable Well-being” (BES) framework published by ISTAT, focusing on three domains: socio-demography, employment, and personal safety at the provincial level. This integrated methodology enables the detection of both the intensity and spatial configuration of disadvantage across Italian territories. It provides a robust foundation for evidence-based and place-sensitive policy interventions.
References
BARCA F. 2009. An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_v0306.pdf
CAMPELLO R. J. G. B., MOULAVI D., SANDER J. 2013. Density-based clustering based on hierarchical density estimates. In J. Pei, V. S. Tseng, L. Cao, H. Motoda, G. Xu (Eds.), Advances in knowledge discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol 7819, pp. 160–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37456-2_14
CERIOLI A., ZANI S. 1990. A Fuzzy Approach to the Measurement of Poverty. In Dagum, C., Zenga, M. (Eds.), Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty (pp. 272–283). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84254-1_14
CHELI B., LEMMI A. 1995. A Totally Fuzzy and Relative Approach to the Multidimensional Analysis of Poverty. Economic Notes,Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 115–134.
CHARRON N., LAPUENTE V., ROTHSTEIN B. 2013. Quality of government and corruption from a European perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545591
ESTER M., KRIEGEL H. P., SANDER J., XU X. 1996. A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise. In Proceedings of the second international conference on knowledge discovery and Data Mining (KDD’96), (pp.226–231). AAAI Press.
ISTAT 2024. Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia – Indicatori territoriali. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/benessere-e-sostenibile
OECD 2020. How’s Life? Measuring Well-being. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9870c393-en
STIGLITZ J. E., SEN A., FITOUSSI J. P. 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic performance and social progress. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/118025/118123/Fitoussi+Commission+report
UNDP 2023. Human Development Report: Breaking the Gridlock. UNDP. https://hdr.undp.org
ZADEH L. A. 1965. Fuzzy Sets. Information and control, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lucia Mongelli, Paola Perchinunno, Samuela L'Abbate, Antonella Massari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

