The socio-economic gender gap in Italy: a territorial analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71014/sieds.v80i4.470Abstract
This paper proposes an experimental analysis of socio-economic gender inequality in Italy using the information potential of integrated administrative archives. There are several international indices to measure gender inequality at the national level, but they are not able to reflect territorial heterogeneity. Thus, a measure of socio-economic gender gap has been created to allow a comparative analysis of the Italian provinces/metropolitan cities. A set of indicators are analysed and a composite index is constructed. The dimension with the best performance in Italy is education; women have better values than men in the individual indicators. The analysis of the individual indicators of work and income confirms the strong disadvantage of women. It also shows a North-South dualism: the gender gap in the work dimension is greater in the Southern provinces, while the gender gap in income is greater in the North, especially in the North-East. The composite index highlights a greater gender gap in some provinces of the South but also in some provinces of Central and Northern Italy.
References
AGARWAL B. 1994. Gender and Command Over Property: A Critical Gap in Economic Analysis and Policy in South Asia, World Development, Vol. 22, No.10, pp. 1455 – 1478.
ALAIMO L.S., NANNI G. 2018, Gender inequality in Italy: a territorial analysis, Rivista Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, Vol. LXXII No. 4.
ANSELIN L. 1995. Local Indicators of Spatial Association - LISA, Geographical Analysis, Vol. 27, pp. 93-115.
ASVIS. 2023. L’eguaglianza di genere: un obiettivo trasversale. Position paper, Gruppo di Lavoro sul Goal 5.
BENERIA L. and PERMANYER I. 2010. The Measurement of Socio-economic Gender Inequality Revisited, Development and Change, Vol. 41, No.3, pp. 375-399.
BLALOCK H. M. 1964. Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
BLUMBERG R. L. 2005. “Women’s Economic Empowerment as the ‘Magic Potion’ of Development?” Paper presented at the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Philadelphia, PA, August.
CAMILLETTI E. 2024. Measuring gender equality: review of existing measures and reflections for future research. GRASSP working paper, Unicef.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2010. Ex post evaluation of the ERDF in objectives 1 & 2 (2000–2006). Synthesis report.
GAROFALO G. 2014. Il Progetto ARCHIMEDE obiettivi e risultati sperimentali. Istat Working Paper.
GAUTHIER A. H, KOTOWSKA I. E., VONO DE VILHENA D. (Eds). Gender (In)Equality over the Life Course. Evidence from the Generations & Gender Programme, Discussion Paper 10, Population Europe.
INAPP. 2024. Rapporto annuale su mercato del lavoro e politiche di genere 2024, Roma.
INPS. 2024. Analisi dei divari di genere nel mercato del lavoro e nel sistema previdenziale attraverso i dati INPS.
ISTAT e CNEL. 2025. Il lavoro delle donne tra ostacoli e opportunità.
ISTAT. 2024a. Livelli di istruzione e ritorni occupazionali anno 2023, https://www.istat.it/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/REPORT-livelli-istruzione.pdf
ISTAT. 2024b. Benessere e diseguaglianze in Italia. ISBN: 978-88-458-2151-6. https://www.istat.it/produzione-editoriale/benessere-e-diseguaglianze-in-italia/
ISTAT. 2025. Structure of earnings in Italy | Year 2022, Statistiche report.
KABEER N. and NATALI L. 2012. Gender Equality and Economic Growth: Is There a Win-Win? IDS Pathways Working Paper. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.
MAGGINO F. 2017. Developing Indicators and Managing the Complexity. In MAGGINO F. (Ed.) Complexity in Society: From Indicators Construction to their Synthesis, Cham: Springer, pp. 87-114.
MAZZIOTTA M., PARETO A. 2022. Normalization methods for spatio-temporal analysis of environmental performance: Revisiting the Min–Max method, Environmetrics, Vol. 33, No. 5.
MAZZIOTTA M., PARETO A. 2024. Statistica per gli indici compositi. Lavis (TN): Giappichelli Editore.
NANNI G. 2023. Gender Equality, Equity, and Equal Opportunities. In DI BELLA E., FACHELLI S., LOPEZ-ROLDAN P., SUTER C. Measuring gender equality. A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Some EU Countries, Social Indicators Research Series, Vol. 87, pp. 1-30.
OECD. 2017. How’s Life? 2017: Measuring Well-being, Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/how_life-2017-en
RICHARDT N. 2008. Gender Gap. In DARITY JR. W. A., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 2nd edition, USA: Macmillan Social Science Library, Vol. 3, pp. 277-279.
RIDGEWAY C. L. 1992. Gender, Interaction, and Inequality. New York: Springer Science-Verlag New York inc.
ROBEYNS I. 2003. Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, Vol. 9, No. 2-3, pp. 61-92.
SALZMAN J. 2003. Methodological Choices Encountered in the Construction of Composite Indices of Economic and Social Well-Being. Technical Report, Center for the Study of Living Standards, Ottawa.
SEN A. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
STEWART F. 2009. Horizontal Inequality: Two Types of Trap. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 315–340.
UN WOMEN. 2018. Why gender equality matters across all SDGS.
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 2022. Human Development Report 2021/2022.
WEF. 2024. The Global Gender Gap Report 2024, World Economic Forum.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sara Casacci

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

