Multidimensional well-being deprivation among Italian youth

Authors

  • Elisabetta Segre ISTAT
  • Alessandra Tinto Istat
  • Miria Savioli Istat
  • Anna Villa Istat
  • Romina Fraboni Istat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71014/sieds.v80i3.483

Keywords:

well-being, deprivation, multidimensional poverty, Alkire-Foster method, youth

Abstract

The aim of this work is to examine the deprivation of young people (18-34) living in Italy along several dimensions of well-being. We use the Alkire-Foster (A-F) methodology, which relies on a dual-cut off method of identification to calculate a multidimensional deprivation indicator with several desirable characteristics, including decomposability. The identification of dimensions and indicators is grounded on the framework implemented by Istat to measure Equitable and sustainable well-being (BES framework, from the Italian acronym). Since the A-F methodology requires data for all indicators at the individual level, we use the multipurpose households’ survey on Aspects of Daily Life yearly conducted by Istat, covering a wide range of BES dimensions and indicators. We identify five dimensions (Health, Work and education, Subjective well-being, Social cohesion, and Living context). From the results, we can draw conclusions on the trend, the dimensions and the population groups contributing the most to well-being deprivation. Those living in the south show the highest levels of deprivation, especially in the Work and education dimension. The dimension contributing the most to youth well-being deprivation is Social cohesion. Special attention should be devoted to the Health dimension: its contribution to the overall level of multidimensional deprivation is relatively higher in the northern regions, and this dimension is the only one that shows a steady worsening over time.

References

AABERGE R., BRANDOLINI A. Multidimensional poverty and inequality. Discussion Papers , No. 792, Statistic Norway Research Department.

ALKIRE S., APABLAZA M. 2016. Multidimensional Poverty in Europe 2006–2012: Illustrating a Methodology. OPHI Working Paper 74, University of Oxford, Oxford.

ALKIRE S., FOSTER J. 2011. Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 9, pp.289-314.

ALKIRE S., SANTOS M.E.. 2010. Acute Multidimensional Poverty: A New Index for Developing Countries. Human Development Research Paper 2010/11, United Nations Development Programme.

ANAND S., SEN A.K. 1997. Concepts of Human Development and Poverty: A Multi-dimensional Perspective. Background Paper, United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 1997.

ATKINSON A.B. 2003. Multidimensional Deprivation: Contrasting Social Welfare and Counting Approaches. Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 1, pp. 51-65.

BACCHINI F., BALDAZZI B., DE CARLI R., DI BIAGIO L., SAVIOLI M., SORVILLO M. P., TINTO A. 2021. The Evolution of the Italian Framework to Measure Well-Being. Journal of Official Statistics, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 317-339. https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2021-0014

BETTI G., CHELI B., LEMMI A., VERMA V. 2008. The Fuzzy Set Approach to Multidimensional Poverty: the Case of Italy in the 1990s. In: KAKWANI N. and SILBER J. (Eds.), Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 30-48.

BILLI A., SCOTTI M. 2018. La povertà multidimensionale: sperimentare l’MPI in Italia. LaborEst, Vol. 16, pp. 20-24.

BOURGUIGNON F., CHAKRAVARTY S. R. 2003. The measurement of multidimensional poverty. Journal of economic inequality, Vol. 1, pp. 25-49.

CHELI B, LEMMI A. 1995. A “Totally” Fuzzy and Relative Approach to the Multidimensional Analysis of Poverty. Economic Notes, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp.115-134.

DE ROSA D. 2021. Are Italians Getting Multidimensionally Poorer? Evidence

on the Lack of Equitable and Sustainable Well‑Being. Italian Economic Journal Vol. 8, pp.145–174.

DHONGDE S., HAVEMAN R. 2017. Multi-Dimensional Deprivation in the U.S. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 133, No. 2, pp. 477-500.

D’ATTOMA I., MATTEUCCI M. 2024. Multidimensional poverty: an analysis of definitions, measurement tools, applications and their evolution over time through a systematic review of the literature up to 2019. Quality and Quantity, Vol. 58, pp. 3171–3213

GLASSMAN B. 2024. The Composition of the Population Deprived in Multiple Dimensions. Social, Economic, and Housing Statistics Division Working Papers No. FY-2024-30, United States Census Bureau.

ISTAT. 2024. Bes 2023. Equitable and sustainable well-being in Italy. Istituto nazionale di statistica, Rome.

SEN A. K. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin.

SUPPA N. 2016. Comparing monetary and multidimensional poverty in Germany. OPHI Working Paper 103, University of Oxford, Oxford.

SUPPA N. 2018. Towards a multidimensional poverty index for Germany. Empirica, Vol. 45, pp. 655-683.

WHELAN, C.T., NOLAN, B., MAÎTRE, B. 2014. Multidimensional Poverty Measurement in Europe: An Application of the Adjusted Headcount Approach. Journal of European Social Policy Vol. 24, pp. 183-197.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

Issue

Section

Articles